Tuesday, May 13, 2008 - Posts

• Battlestar Galactica - It is not too late

  Read More... Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:11 PM from Pablo Fernicola's Personal Blog | 0 Comments Filed under: Personal

• David Teitlebaum on Channel 9 reviewing WPF 3.5 SP1 features

  It's WPF week over on Channel 9 and a new episode went up yesterday which has David Teitlebaum, a PM on the WPF team, giving an overview and demos of the new lower level features that SP1 brings to the table. You don't want to miss it, so hop on over and check that out . I think we all know the Effects stuff is the most sought after feature, but I know a lot of people were looking for the WriteableBitmap feature since WPF 3.0 and now they have it and, judging by the demo, the performance is amazing. Read More... Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:48 AM from hacked.brain | 0 Comments

• MVP & MVC simply put

  This question seems to get asked a lot, this recent article on codeproject does a decent job of explanation as well as this article from Infragistics Guidisan Todd Snyder . If I was sum it up very simply, the different is entry point into the pattern. In MVC the entry point is the controller, if you look at the Microsoft MVC framework for example the controller class is where you bind your view and everything else (model) together. In MVP mean while the entry point is the view, webforms lends it's self very well to this pattern as you can bind the aspx and your view and use the normal aspx entry point to get at the rest of your patttern (in fact winforms works well on this pattern as well). Going a bit further You can break down your view into two, a view and View-extender. The temptation in webforms land in a passive sense of the pattern is hold all sorts of view centric items on the presenter. If you have lots going on in your presenter for your view and you want to keep your view ultra Read More... Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:08 AM from Andrew Stopford's Weblog | 0 Comments Filed under: Patterns, General Software Development